Fish Crazy
Your one stop fish keeping site

The carbon argument....again?

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 2 Followers

Not Ranked
Posts 20
steviebobs Posted: 6-29-2008 12:58

 Hi All

Not wishing to start WW3, but the 'carbon or no carbon' argument has been quiet for a few years, it appears.

Any NEW views as whether to use carbon in your filters or not. Also, any genuine evidence to support that news as the topic  appears to be riddled with 'rumour' and 'old wives tales'?

I have tetra filters and change the carbon monthly. Appears to have no bad effects on fish health, plant or algae growth.

SjH

 

Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,779
POTM July 3rd

 If you change it every month then you will have no problems.

Current thinking (and the thinking of most people on here, including me) is that if carbon is left in the filter too long, when it is saturated it will start to leach the stuff it removed back into the water.

There is no scientific evidence of this and from a science point of view, it shouldn't leach anything back.

The big question is do you need the carbon in your filter? Why do we use it? I see no reason to have carbon on a freshwater tank all the time - water quality can be maintained without it so why spend the extra money?

1xTrigon 190
3 Clown Loaches,14 Cardinal Tetras,8 Rummynose Tetras,6 Cory Trileneatus,6 Hatchetfish,4 otocinclus,1 SAE,1 Bristlenose,, 10 amano Shrimp, 1 pair Apisto Agazzizi. 3 Blue Discus
Anubius Barteri,Crinum thianum,Limnophilia sessiflora,Rotala rotundifolia, Echinodorus Blehri, Ech. Parviflorus,Ech. cordifolius, Ech. Tenellus, nymphaea lotus, Hygrophilia polysperma, Microsorum pteropus,Lilaeopsis brasiliensis

1xRekord 60
Blue Lobster, Flash plec
2 Anubias Barteri, 1 Microsorum pteropus 12 litre tank - 3 Glass shrimp, 4 japonica shrimp 1 Anubias Barteri, Riccia, Eleocharis acicularis Coming Soon - Bluedave's 5' Bullnose Marine Divider (Watch this space!)

Top 50 Contributor
Posts 850

carbon will only give up whatever it has adsorbed under conditions unlikely to exist in an aquarium, & if they did exist there would not be a problem as ther would be little alive in the tank.

 

Personally I find is a wast of money

 

If you can't be bothered to do it right, don't bother to do it at all

Top 10 Contributor
Female
Posts 11,704
POTM 3rd

 im with mike if you want to waste your money go ahead, same with changing sponges every month, what a waste i used to do that too, the only thing carbon does is remove nasties from your tank, such as heavy metal and medication, with a new tank set up its prob worth using the carbon supplied as a precaution but unless youve added anything to the water then its doing nothing. di

Always remember that you are unique; just like everyone else.

Top 10 Contributor
Female
Posts 23,619
Mod

 Personally I don't think it is essential either. Plus if you are using ferts and carbon , you might as well throw the ferts down the sink and the carbon will be taking them out of the water.

Some use carbon saying it polishes the water. Filter floss also polishes the water and a big bag of it lasts for ages and is cheapSmile

Carbon , as Di has said is fine for removing last traces of meds when you'd have it in the filter for just a couple of days. But as for using it all the time, I'd say no thanksNo

Not Ranked
Posts 20

 Thanks - seems views have not changed.

When I got my filter (tetra) it came with a few carbon loaded 'refills'

When I had a white spot problem early on I removed the carbon for the obvious reason of not wanting my medis removed. As I got into the habit of cleaning filters rather than replacing them, I bought a big bag of carbon for about £3 and have replaced the carbon (28g) each month. It has lasted for ages but have to say that its not the cost of the carbon that is/was the issue, more the fact that the more I read on the topic the more diverse were the opinions on just how long it lasted, views ranging  from 3 days to a month, so this thread was to see if any recent developments had changed/reinforced the longevity views.

Frankly, when its gone its gone and I wont replace.

Thanks for your views.

SjH

 

Top 25 Contributor
Posts 4,622
POTM 3rd

i'll only use carbon if I need to remove meds as I don't see much need for it either Smile

 

Top 10 Contributor
Posts 11,896
Mod

 I do use it in my marine I have to say.

On F/W only as mentioned before for meds.

 

FD


Not Ranked
Posts 20

 Thanks All

 

Endo Forumo I think now.

 

Bye

 

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,301

I dot use it but I do have some loose carbon - just in case I need it.  It is very good at soaking up chemicals that you dont want in the water so I keep some just in case the other half decides to spray pledge in the tank!  In a planted tank I certainly wouldnt bother.

 

Fishity fishity fish fish! ;D

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 14,795
Mod

 many years ago, carbon was an acceptable way of polishing the water, but in this day and age it has limited use as has already been stated hereWink




it's my union flag and i want it back


bigeddd, a legend in my own lunch box..

garden photo blog
http://img405.imageshack.us/img_viewer_framed.php?g=1starum3ve.jpg

Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS
Copyright © 2007-2008 Fish Crazy. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems